Filtered by CWE-787
Total 13703 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2025-12196 1 Watchguard 35 Firebox, Firebox M270, Firebox M290 and 32 more 2026-02-26 7.2 High
An Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS's CLI could allow an authenticated privileged user to execute arbitrary code via a specially crafted CLI command.This vulnerability affects Fireware OS 12.0 up to and including 12.11.4, 12.5 up to and including 12.5.13, and 2025.1 up to and including 2025.1.2.
CVE-2025-54957 1 Dolby 1 Udc 2026-02-26 9.8 Critical
An issue was discovered in Dolby UDC 4.5 through 4.13. A crash of the DD+ decoder process can occur when a malformed DD+ bitstream is processed. When Evolution data is processed by evo_priv.c from the DD+ bitstream, the decoder writes that data into a buffer. The length calculation for a write can overflow due to an integer wraparound. This can lead to the allocated buffer being too small, and the out-of-bounds check of the subsequent write to be ineffective, leading to an out-of-bounds write.
CVE-2025-48623 1 Google 1 Android 2026-02-26 7.8 High
In init_pkvm_hyp_vcpu of pkvm.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2025-48624 1 Google 1 Android 2026-02-26 7.8 High
In multiple functions of arm-smmu-v3.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2025-11795 1 Autodesk 1 3ds Max 2026-02-26 7.8 High
A maliciously crafted JPG file, when parsed through Autodesk 3ds Max, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
CVE-2025-48638 1 Google 1 Android 2026-02-26 7.8 High
In __pkvm_load_tracing of trace.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2025-13042 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more 2026-02-26 8.8 High
Inappropriate implementation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 142.0.7444.166 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2025-14333 1 Mozilla 3 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Thunderbird 2026-02-26 8.1 High
Memory safety bugs present in Firefox ESR 140.5, Thunderbird ESR 140.5, Firefox 145 and Thunderbird 145. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 146, Firefox ESR < 140.6, Thunderbird < 146, and Thunderbird < 140.6.
CVE-2025-10920 1 Gimp 1 Gimp 2026-02-26 7.8 High
GIMP ICNS File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of GIMP. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of ICNS files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-27684.
CVE-2025-10921 2 Debian, Gimp 2 Debian Linux, Gimp 2026-02-26 7.8 High
GIMP HDR File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of GIMP. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of HDR files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a heap-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-27803.
CVE-2025-10922 2 Debian, Gimp 2 Debian Linux, Gimp 2026-02-26 7.8 High
GIMP DCM File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of GIMP. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DCM files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a heap-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-27863.
CVE-2025-10925 1 Gimp 1 Gimp 2026-02-26 7.8 High
GIMP ILBM File Parsing Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of GIMP. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of ILBM files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-27793.
CVE-2025-62550 1 Microsoft 1 Azure Monitor Agent 2026-02-26 8.8 High
Out-of-bounds write in Azure Monitor Agent allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
CVE-2025-58413 1 Fortinet 2 Fortios, Fortisase 2026-02-26 6.9 Medium
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiOS 7.0 all versions, FortiOS 6.4 all versions, FortiOS 6.2 all versions, FortiOS 6.0 all versions, FortiSASE 25.3.b allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted packets
CVE-2025-48839 1 Fortinet 1 Fortiadc 2026-02-26 6.3 Medium
An Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability [CWE-787] in FortiADC 8.0.0, 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, 7.2 all versions, 7.1 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 6.2 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code via specially crafted HTTP requests.
CVE-2025-36924 1 Google 1 Android 2026-02-26 8 High
In ss_DecodeLcsAssistDataReqMsg(void) of ss_LcsManagement.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2025-36925 1 Google 1 Android 2026-02-26 7.8 High
In WAVES_send_data_to_dsp of libaoc_waves.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2025-36927 1 Google 1 Android 2026-02-26 7.8 High
In GetTachyonCommand of tachyon_server_common.h, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2025-36928 1 Google 1 Android 2026-02-26 7.8 High
In GetHostAddress of gxp_buffer.h, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2025-36930 1 Google 1 Android 2026-02-26 7.8 High
In GetHostAddress of gxp_buffer.h, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.