Export limit exceeded: 24791 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (24791 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-14355 | 1 Shapeshift | 2 Keepkey, Keepkey Firmware | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| On ShapeShift KeepKey devices, a side channel for the row-based OLED display was found. The power consumption of each row-based display cycle depends on the number of illuminated pixels, allowing a partial recovery of display contents. For example, a hardware implant in the USB cable might be able to leverage this behavior to recover secret data shown on the display. In other words, the side channel is relevant only if the attacker has enough control over the device's USB connection to make power-consumption measurements at a time when secret data is displayed. The side channel is not relevant in other circumstances, such as a stolen device that is not currently displaying secret data. NOTE: the vendor's position is that there is "insignificant risk. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14354 | 1 Ledger | 4 Nano S, Nano S Firmware, Nano X and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| On Ledger Nano S and Nano X devices, a side channel for the row-based OLED display was found. The power consumption of each row-based display cycle depends on the number of illuminated pixels, allowing a partial recovery of display contents. For example, a hardware implant in the USB cable might be able to leverage this behavior to recover confidential secrets such as the PIN and BIP39 mnemonic. In other words, the side channel is relevant only if the attacker has enough control over the device's USB connection to make power-consumption measurements at a time when secret data is displayed. The side channel is not relevant in other circumstances, such as a stolen device that is not currently displaying secret data. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14353 | 1 Trezor | 2 One, One Firmware | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| On Trezor One devices before 1.8.2, a side channel for the row-based OLED display was found. The power consumption of each row-based display cycle depends on the number of illuminated pixels, allowing a partial recovery of display contents. For example, a hardware implant in the USB cable might be able to leverage this behavior to recover confidential secrets such as the PIN and BIP39 mnemonic. In other words, the side channel is relevant only if the attacker has enough control over the device's USB connection to make power-consumption measurements at a time when secret data is displayed. The side channel is not relevant in other circumstances, such as a stolen device that is not currently displaying secret data. NOTE: this CVE applies exclusively to the Trezor One, and does not refer to any issues with OLED displays on other devices. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14301 | 1 Ricoh | 104 M 2700, M 2700 Firmware, M 2701 and 101 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Ricoh SP C250DN 1.06 devices have Incorrect Access Control (issue 1 of 2). | ||||
| CVE-2019-14280 | 1 Craftcms | 1 Craft Cms | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In some circumstances, Craft 2 before 2.7.10 and 3 before 3.2.6 wasn't stripping EXIF data from user-uploaded images when it was configured to do so, potentially exposing personal/geolocation data to the public. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14250 | 3 Canonical, Gnu, Opensuse | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Binutils, Leap | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in GNU libiberty, as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.32. simple_object_elf_match in simple-object-elf.c does not check for a zero shstrndx value, leading to an integer overflow and resultant heap-based buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14243 | 1 Haproxy | 1 Proxyprotocol | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| headerv2.go in mastercactapus proxyprotocol before 0.0.2, as used in the mastercactapus caddy-proxyprotocol plugin through 0.0.2 for Caddy, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (webserver panic and daemon crash) via a crafted HAProxy PROXY v2 request with truncated source/destination address data. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14234 | 4 Debian, Djangoproject, Fedoraproject and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Django, Fedora and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Django 1.11.x before 1.11.23, 2.1.x before 2.1.11, and 2.2.x before 2.2.4. Due to an error in shallow key transformation, key and index lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.JSONField, and key lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.HStoreField, were subject to SQL injection. This could, for example, be exploited via crafted use of "OR 1=1" in a key or index name to return all records, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the **kwargs passed to the QuerySet.filter() function. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14233 | 3 Djangoproject, Opensuse, Redhat | 3 Django, Leap, Openstack | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Django 1.11.x before 1.11.23, 2.1.x before 2.1.11, and 2.2.x before 2.2.4. Due to the behaviour of the underlying HTMLParser, django.utils.html.strip_tags would be extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs containing large sequences of nested incomplete HTML entities. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14232 | 3 Djangoproject, Opensuse, Redhat | 3 Django, Leap, Openstack | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 1.11.x before 1.11.23, 2.1.x before 2.1.11, and 2.2.x before 2.2.4. If django.utils.text.Truncator's chars() and words() methods were passed the html=True argument, they were extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs due to a catastrophic backtracking vulnerability in a regular expression. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which were thus vulnerable. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14211 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 Phantompdf, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF before 8.3.11. The application could crash due to the lack of proper validation of the existence of an object prior to performing operations on that object when executing JavaScript. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14123 | 1 Qualcomm | 18 Kamorta, Kamorta Firmware, Qcs404 and 15 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Possible buffer overflow and over read possible due to missing bounds checks for fixed limits if we consider widevine HLOS client as non-trustable in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in Kamorta, QCS404, Rennell, SC7180, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8250, SXR2130 | ||||
| CVE-2019-14082 | 1 Qualcomm | 12 Ipq8074, Ipq8074 Firmware, Mdm9206 and 9 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.1 Critical |
| Potential buffer over-read due to lack of bound check of memory offset passed in WLAN firmware in Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in IPQ8074, MDM9206, MDM9207C, MDM9607, QCN7605, SM8150 | ||||
| CVE-2019-14074 | 1 Qualcomm | 140 Apq8009, Apq8009 Firmware, Apq8017 and 137 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| u'Heap overflow in diag command handler due to lack of check of packet length received from user' in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8076, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, Bitra, IPQ6018, IPQ8074, Kamorta, MDM9150, MDM9205, MDM9206, MDM9207C, MDM9607, MDM9625, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9645, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8905, MSM8909, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCA8081, QCM2150, QCN7605, QCS404, QCS405, QCS605, QCS610, QM215, Rennell, SA415M, SA6155P, Saipan, SC7180, SC8180X, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM429W, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDM850, SDX20, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SM8250, SXR1130, SXR2130 | ||||
| CVE-2019-14067 | 1 Qualcomm | 108 Apq8009, Apq8009 Firmware, Apq8017 and 105 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| Using non-time-constant functions like memcmp to compare sensitive data can lead to information leakage through timing side channel issue. in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8096, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, Kamorta, MDM9150, MDM9205, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9650, MSM8909, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCM2150, QCS404, QCS405, QCS605, QM215, Rennell, SA415M, SA6155P, SC7180, SC8180X, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM429W, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDM850, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SXR1130, SXR2130 | ||||
| CVE-2019-14047 | 1 Qualcomm | 30 Apq8053, Apq8053 Firmware, Apq8096au and 27 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| While IPA driver processes route add rule IOCTL, there is no input validation of the rule ID prior to adding the rule to the IPA HW commit list in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables in APQ8053, APQ8096AU, MDM9607, MSM8909W, MSM8996, MSM8996AU, QCN7605, QCS605, SC8180X, SDA845, SDX20, SDX24, SDX55, SM8150, SXR1130 | ||||
| CVE-2019-14038 | 1 Qualcomm | 46 Apq8009, Apq8009 Firmware, Apq8053 and 43 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.1 High |
| Buffer over-read in ADSP parse function due to lack of check for availability of sufficient data payload received in command response in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables in APQ8009, APQ8053, APQ8098, MDM9206, MDM9207C, MDM9607, MDM9640, MDM9650, MSM8905, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8953, QCS605, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM429W, SDM439, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDX20, SDX24 | ||||
| CVE-2019-14010 | 1 Qualcomm | 22 Mdm9607, Mdm9607 Firmware, Nicobar and 19 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| The device may enter into error state when some tool or application gets failure at 1st buffer map all and performs 2nd buffer map which happens to be at same physical address in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music in MDM9607, Nicobar, Rennell, SA6155P, SDM660, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SM8250, SXR2130 | ||||
| CVE-2019-14007 | 1 Qualcomm | 98 Apq8009, Apq8009 Firmware, Apq8017 and 95 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| Due to the use of non-time-constant comparison functions there is issue in timing side channels which can be used as a potential side channel for SUI corruption in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8096, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, MDM9150, MDM9205, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9650, MSM8905, MSM8909, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCS404, QCS405, QCS605, QM215, Rennell, SA6155P, SC7180, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDM850, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SXR1130, SXR2130 | ||||
| CVE-2019-13932 | 1 Siemens | 1 Xhq | 2024-11-21 | 9.1 Critical |
| A vulnerability has been identified in XHQ (All versions < V6.0.0.2). The web application requests could be manipulated, causing the the application to behave in unexpected ways for legitimate users. Successful exploitation does not require for an attacker to be authenticated. A successful attack could allow the import of scripts or generation of malicious links. This could allow the attacker to read or modify contents of the web application. At the time of advisory publication no public exploitation of this security vulnerability was known. | ||||