Export limit exceeded: 77110 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (77110 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-7026 | 2026-02-26 | 8.2 High | ||
| A vulnerability in the Software SMI handler (SwSmiInputValue 0xB2) allows a local attacker to control the RBX register, which is used as an unchecked pointer in the CommandRcx0 function. If the contents at RBX match certain expected values (e.g., '$DB$' or '2DB$'), the function performs arbitrary writes to System Management RAM (SMRAM), leading to potential privilege escalation to System Management Mode (SMM) and persistent firmware compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2025-47849 | 1 Apache | 2 Apache Cloudstack, Cloudstack | 2026-02-26 | 8.8 High |
| A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Apache CloudStack versions 4.10.0.0 through 4.20.0.0 where a malicious Domain Admin user in the ROOT domain can get the API key and secret key of user-accounts of Admin role type in the same domain. This operation is not appropriately restricted and allows the attacker to assume control over higher-privileged user-accounts. A malicious Domain Admin attacker can impersonate an Admin user-account and gain access to sensitive APIs and resources that could result in the compromise of resource integrity and confidentiality, data loss, denial of service, and availability of infrastructure managed by CloudStack. Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache CloudStack 4.19.3.0 or 4.20.1.0, which fixes the issue with the following: * Strict validation on Role Type hierarchy: the caller's role must be equal to or higher than the target user's role. * API privilege comparison: the caller must possess all privileges of the user they are operating on. * Two new domain-level settings (restricted to the default admin): - role.types.allowed.for.operations.on.accounts.of.same.role.type: Defines which role types are allowed to act on users of the same role type. Default: "Admin, DomainAdmin, ResourceAdmin". - allow.operations.on.users.in.same.account: Allows/disallows user operations within the same account. Default: true. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26521 | 1 Apache | 2 Apache Cloudstack, Cloudstack | 2026-02-26 | 8.1 High |
| When an Apache CloudStack user-account creates a CKS-based Kubernetes cluster in a project, the API key and the secret key of the 'kubeadmin' user of the caller account are used to create the secret config in the CKS-based Kubernetes cluster. A member of the project who can access the CKS-based Kubernetes cluster, can also access the API key and secret key of the 'kubeadmin' user of the CKS cluster's creator's account. An attacker who's a member of the project can exploit this to impersonate and perform privileged actions that can result in complete compromise of the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of resources owned by the creator's account. CKS users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.19.3.0 or 4.20.1.0, which fixes this issue.Updating Existing Kubernetes Clusters in ProjectsA service account should be created for each project to provide limited access specifically for Kubernetes cluster providers and autoscaling. Follow the steps below to create a new service account, update the secret inside the cluster, and regenerate existing API and service keys:1. Create a New Service AccountCreate a new account using the role "Project Kubernetes Service Role" with the following details: Account Name kubeadmin-<FIRST_EIGHT_CHARACTERS_OF_PROJECT_ID> First Name Kubernetes Last Name Service User Account Type 0 (Normal User) Role ID <ID_OF_SERVICE_ROLE> 2. Add the Service Account to the ProjectAdd this account to the project where the Kubernetes cluster(s) are hosted. 3. Generate API and Secret KeysGenerate API Key and Secret Key for the default user of this account. 4. Update the CloudStack Secret in the Kubernetes ClusterCreate a temporary file `/tmp/cloud-config` with the following data: api-url = <API_URL> # For example: <MS_URL>/client/api api-key = <SERVICE_USER_API_KEY> secret-key = <SERVICE_USER_SECRET_KEY> project-id = <PROJECT_ID> Delete the existing secret using kubectl and Kubernetes cluster config: ./kubectl --kubeconfig kube.conf -n kube-system delete secret cloudstack-secret Create a new secret using kubectl and Kubernetes cluster config: ./kubectl --kubeconfig kube.conf -n kube-system create secret generic cloudstack-secret --from-file=/tmp/cloud-config Remove the temporary file: rm /tmp/cloud-config5. Regenerate API and Secret KeysRegenerate the API and secret keys for the original user account that was used to create the Kubernetes cluster. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5958 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-02-26 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in Media in Google Chrome prior to 137.0.7151.103 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2024-51768 | 1 Hpe | 1 Autopass License Server | 2026-02-26 | 8 High |
| An hsqldb-related remote code execution vulnerability exists in HPE AutoPass License Server (APLS) prior to 9.17. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5959 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-02-26 | 8.8 High |
| Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 137.0.7151.103 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2025-5687 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Mozilla Vpn, Vpn | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability in Mozilla VPN on macOS allows privilege escalation from a normal user to root. *This bug only affects Mozilla VPN on macOS. Other operating systems are unaffected.* This vulnerability affects Mozilla VPN 2.28.0 < (macOS). | ||||
| CVE-2025-6265 | 1 Zyxel | 48 Nwa110ax, Nwa110ax Firmware, Nwa1123ac Pro and 45 more | 2026-02-26 | 7.2 High |
| A path traversal vulnerability in the file_upload-cgi CGI program of Zyxel NWA50AX PRO firmware version 7.10(ACGE.2) and earlier could allow an authenticated attacker with administrator privileges to access specific directories and delete files, such as the configuration file, on the affected device. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7656 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-02-26 | 8.8 High |
| Integer overflow in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 138.0.7204.157 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2025-6558 | 5 Apple, Debian, Google and 2 more | 10 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 7 more | 2026-02-26 | 8.8 High |
| Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE and GPU in Google Chrome prior to 138.0.7204.157 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2025-4613 | 2 Google, Microsoft | 2 Web Designer, Windows | 2026-02-26 | 8.8 High |
| Path traversal in Google Web Designer's template handling versions prior to 16.3.0.0407 on Windows allows attacker to achieve remote code execution by tricking users into downloading a malicious ad template | ||||
| CVE-2025-7657 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-02-26 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in WebRTC in Google Chrome prior to 138.0.7204.157 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2025-27689 | 1 Dell | 1 Idrac Tools | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| Dell iDRAC Tools, version(s) prior to 11.3.0.0, contain(s) an Improper Access Control vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4232 | 2 Palo Alto Networks, Paloaltonetworks | 2 Globalprotect App, Globalprotect | 2026-02-26 | 8.8 High |
| An improper neutralization of wildcards vulnerability in the log collection feature of Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect™ app on macOS allows a non administrative user to escalate their privileges to root. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4231 | 2 Palo Alto Networks, Paloaltonetworks | 2 Pan-os, Pan-os | 2026-02-26 | 7.2 High |
| A command injection vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS® enables an authenticated administrative user to perform actions as the root user. The attacker must have network access to the management web interface and successfully authenticate to exploit this issue. Cloud NGFW and Prisma Access are not impacted by this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30749 | 1 Oracle | 5 Graalvm, Graalvm For Jdk, Java Se and 2 more | 2026-02-26 | 8.1 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: 2D). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 8u451, 8u451-perf, 11.0.27, 17.0.15, 21.0.7, 24.0.1; Oracle GraalVM for JDK: 17.0.15, 21.0.7 and 24.0.1; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 21.3.14. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability does not apply to Java deployments, typically in servers, that load and run only trusted code (e.g., code installed by an administrator). CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2025-30751 | 1 Oracle | 3 Database, Database - , Database Server | 2026-02-26 | 8.8 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Database component of Oracle Database Server. Supported versions that are affected are 19.27 and 23.4-23.8. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker having Create Session, Create Procedure privilege with network access via Oracle Net to compromise Oracle Database. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Database. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2025-50060 | 1 Oracle | 1 Bi Publisher | 2026-02-26 | 8.1 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle BI Publisher product of Oracle Analytics (component: Web Server). Supported versions that are affected are 7.6.0.0.0, 8.2.0.0.0 and 12.2.1.4.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle BI Publisher. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle BI Publisher accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle BI Publisher accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2025-50062 | 1 Oracle | 1 Peoplesoft Enterprise Hcm Global Payroll Core | 2026-02-26 | 8.1 High |
| Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise HCM Global Payroll Core product of Oracle PeopleSoft (component: Global Payroll for Core). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.51 and 9.2.52. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise HCM Global Payroll Core. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all PeopleSoft Enterprise HCM Global Payroll Core accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all PeopleSoft Enterprise HCM Global Payroll Core accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2025-36633 | 2 Microsoft, Tenable | 2 Windows, Nessus Agent | 2026-02-26 | 8.8 High |
| In Tenable Agent versions prior to 10.8.5 on a Windows host, it was found that a non-administrative user could arbitrarily delete local system files with SYSTEM privilege, potentially leading to local privilege escalation. | ||||