Export limit exceeded: 17670 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 337988 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (337988 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-1663 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 14.4 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an authenticated user with group import permissions to create labels in private projects due to improper authorization validation in the group import process under certain circumstances. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1732 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 12.6 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an authenticated user to disclose confidential issue titles due to improper filtering under certain circumstances. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12555 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 15.1 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that, under certain conditions, could have allowed an authenticated user to access previous pipeline job information on projects with repository and CI/CD disabled due to improper authorization checks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1182 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 8.14 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an authenticated user to gain unauthorized access to confidential issue title created in public projects under certain circumstances. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32304 | 1 Locutus | 1 Locutus | 2026-03-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| Locutus brings stdlibs of other programming languages to JavaScript for educational purposes. Prior to 3.0.14, the create_function(args, code) function passes both parameters directly to the Function constructor without any sanitization, allowing arbitrary code execution. This is distinct from CVE-2026-29091 which was call_user_func_array using eval() in v2.x. This finding affects create_function using new Function() in v3.x. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.0.14. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32302 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-03-13 | 8.1 High |
| OpenClaw is a personal AI assistant. Prior to 2026.3.11, browser-originated WebSocket connections could bypass origin validation when gateway.auth.mode was set to trusted-proxy and the request arrived with proxy headers. A page served from an untrusted origin could connect through a trusted reverse proxy, inherit proxy-authenticated identity, and establish a privileged operator session. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.3.11. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32301 | 1 Centrifugal | 1 Centrifugo | 2026-03-13 | 9.3 Critical |
| Centrifugo is an open-source scalable real-time messaging server. Prior to 6.7.0, Centrifugo is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) when configured with a dynamic JWKS endpoint URL using template variables (e.g. {{tenant}}). An unauthenticated attacker can craft a JWT with a malicious iss or aud claim value that gets interpolated into the JWKS fetch URL before the token signature is verified, causing Centrifugo to make an outbound HTTP request to an attacker-controlled destination. This vulnerability is fixed in 6.7.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25076 | 1 Anchore | 1 Anchore | 2026-03-13 | 7.3 High |
| Anchore Enterprise versions before 5.25.1 contain an SQL injection vulnerability in the GraphQL Reports API. An authenticated attacker that is able to access the GraphQL API could execute arbitrary SQL instructions resulting in modifications to the data contained in the Anchore Enterprise database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2229 | 1 Undici | 1 Undici | 2026-03-13 | 7.5 High |
| ImpactThe undici WebSocket client is vulnerable to a denial-of-service attack due to improper validation of the server_max_window_bits parameter in the permessage-deflate extension. When a WebSocket client connects to a server, it automatically advertises support for permessage-deflate compression. A malicious server can respond with an out-of-range server_max_window_bits value (outside zlib's valid range of 8-15). When the server subsequently sends a compressed frame, the client attempts to create a zlib InflateRaw instance with the invalid windowBits value, causing a synchronous RangeError exception that is not caught, resulting in immediate process termination. The vulnerability exists because: * The isValidClientWindowBits() function only validates that the value contains ASCII digits, not that it falls within the valid range 8-15 * The createInflateRaw() call is not wrapped in a try-catch block * The resulting exception propagates up through the call stack and crashes the Node.js process | ||||
| CVE-2024-14024 | 2 Qnap, Qnap Systems | 2 Video Station, Video Station | 2026-03-13 | 6.7 Medium |
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability has been reported to affect Video Station. If an attacker gains local network access who have also gained an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to compromise the security of the system. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: Video Station 5.8.2 and later | ||||
| CVE-2024-14025 | 2 Qnap, Qnap Systems | 2 Video Station, Video Station | 2026-03-13 | 6.7 Medium |
| An SQL injection vulnerability has been reported to affect Video Station. If an attacker gains local network access who have also gained an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to execute unauthorized code or commands. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: Video Station 5.8.2 and later | ||||
| CVE-2026-1528 | 1 Undici | 1 Undici | 2026-03-13 | 7.5 High |
| ImpactA server can reply with a WebSocket frame using the 64-bit length form and an extremely large length. undici's ByteParser overflows internal math, ends up in an invalid state, and throws a fatal TypeError that terminates the process. Patches Patched in the undici version v7.24.0 and v6.24.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25819 | 1 Hms-networks | 2 Ewon Cosy, Ewon Flexy | 2026-03-13 | 7.5 High |
| HMS Networks Ewon Flexy with firmware before 15.0s4, Cosy+ with firmware 22.xx before 22.1s6, and Cosy+ with firmware 23.xx before 23.0s3 allows unauthenticated attackers to cause a Denial of Service by using a specially crafted HTTP request that leads to a reboot of the device, provided they have access to the device's GUI. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25818 | 1 Hms-networks | 2 Ewon Cosy, Ewon Flexy | 2026-03-13 | 9.1 Critical |
| HMS Networks Ewon Flexy with firmware before 15.0s4, Cosy+ with firmware 22.xx before 22.1s6, and Cosy+ with firmware 23.xx before 23.0s3 have weak entropy for authentication cookies, allowing an attacker with a stolen session cookie to find the user password by brute-forcing an encryption parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25817 | 1 Hms-networks | 2 Ewon Cosy, Ewon Flexy | 2026-03-13 | 8.8 High |
| HMS Networks Ewon Flexy with firmware before 15.0s4, Cosy+ with firmware 22.xx before 22.1s6, and Cosy+ with firmware 23.xx before 23.0s3 have improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command allowing remote code execution by attackers with low privilege access on the gateway, provided the attacker has credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3927 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-03-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| Incorrect security UI in PictureInPicture in Google Chrome prior to 146.0.7680.71 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-2415 | 1 Pretix | 1 Pretix | 2026-03-13 | 5.9 Medium |
| Emails sent by pretix can utilize placeholders that will be filled with customer data. For example, when {name} is used in an email template, it will be replaced with the buyer's name for the final email. This mechanism contained two security-relevant bugs: * It was possible to exfiltrate information about the pretix system through specially crafted placeholder names such as {{event.__init__.__code__.co_filename}}. This way, an attacker with the ability to control email templates (usually every user of the pretix backend) could retrieve sensitive information from the system configuration, including even database passwords or API keys. pretix does include mechanisms to prevent the usage of such malicious placeholders, however due to a mistake in the code, they were not fully effective for the email subject. * Placeholders in subjects and plain text bodies of emails were wrongfully evaluated twice. Therefore, if the first evaluation of a placeholder again contains a placeholder, this second placeholder was rendered. This allows the rendering of placeholders controlled by the ticket buyer, and therefore the exploitation of the first issue as a ticket buyer. Luckily, the only buyer-controlled placeholder available in pretix by default (that is not validated in a way that prevents the issue) is {invoice_company}, which is very unusual (but not impossible) to be contained in an email subject template. In addition to broadening the attack surface of the first issue, this could theoretically also leak information about an order to one of the attendees within that order. However, we also consider this scenario very unlikely under typical conditions. Out of caution, we recommend that you rotate all passwords and API keys contained in your pretix.cfg https://docs.pretix.eu/self-hosting/config/ file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2451 | 1 Pretix | 3 Double Opt In Step, Pretix, Pretix-doistep | 2026-03-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| Emails sent by pretix can utilize placeholders that will be filled with customer data. For example, when {name} is used in an email template, it will be replaced with the buyer's name for the final email. This mechanism contained a security-relevant bug: It was possible to exfiltrate information about the pretix system through specially crafted placeholder names such as {{event.__init__.__code__.co_filename}}. This way, an attacker with the ability to control email templates (usually every user of the pretix backend) could retrieve sensitive information from the system configuration, including even database passwords or API keys. pretix does include mechanisms to prevent the usage of such malicious placeholders, however due to a mistake in the code, they were not fully effective for this plugin. Out of caution, we recommend that you rotate all passwords and API keys contained in your pretix.cfg file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1090 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-13 | 8.7 High |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 10.6 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an authenticated user, when the `markdown_placeholders` feature flag was enabled, to inject JavaScript in a browser due to improper sanitization of placeholder content in markdown processing. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1069 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-13 | 7.5 High |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to cause a denial of service by sending specially crafted GraphQL requests due to uncontrolled recursion under certain circumstances. | ||||